Slam Dunk Decisions -
Ever wrestle with a tough decision? The decision was either tough
because you didn't know what the outcome might be or it was tough
because there were competing alternatives that all seemed
attractive. There are resolutions to each of these tough decisions.
For any decision you face, you should as least know the outcome you
want. Call this the ideal solution that is the embodiment of the
reason you are considering a change from the status quo
(what you have now). If things were perfect or just the way you
wanted them, then there would be no need to make a decision. People
make a decision when things are either not perfect or believe
conditions could be better with some alteration of what they have.
When you don't know the outcome of a decision, then all you need to
do is take a couple of steps towards implementing the decision and
keep your eyes open. If the situation seems to be getting better,
then keep going. If the situation seems to be getting worse, stop
and re-evaluate. Sometimes you have to let the reality of the
situation reveal itself before you make a full commitment to any
course of action.
When you have many seemingly good choices (a very desirable
situation to find yourself in), let your intuition be your guide.
Use your conscious mind to separate out the better choices and use
logic to pick the seemingly best choice. Then turn the decision over
to your gut (heart) to decide. That evening, remind yourself that
you need a decision by the time you wake up. The next morning, if
your subconscious mind feels uncomfortable with the choice previous
picked by conscious deliberation, then set that choice aside and
pick another. Repeat the process the next evening before bedtime. If
you awake the next morning feeling that this is the right decision,
it probably is the right decision. Your intuition is significantly
more aware of your true motives that your conscious mind, so it is
best to use this power when making decisions.
No decision is difficult when there is no uncertainty. The
decision is then obvious.
So the time gathering information is useful in reducing
uncertainty. Knowing yourself and your values also aid in
making a decision. When you know what you want and the likely
outcome of a project, the decision boils down to one paying the
price. All decisions are based on aspirations of
improving what one has now by trading giving up some part of the
status quo for the brighter prospect for the expected future
outcome.
Tough Decisions
- Some decisions
are so obvious that you make them without hesitation. Other decisions are so
difficult it seems that there is no satisfactory solution. This website
offers help in making the difficult decisions. By following a
disciplined approach, a decision maker can improve their chances of making the
best decision possible given the circumstances. It my not be the perfect
decision and the outcome may eventually fall short of the decision-maker's desires.
But a decision made
with a disciplined approach and logical deliberation produces better decisions
over the long-run than ones made without it.
Time Management
- A critical decision for everyone is how to spend one's time, energy,
and resources. Most people's lives are already filled with
things that they are already doing or planning to do to fill their
time - the daily quota of 24 hours per day. Only minor decisions
are needed to manage successfully the things that one is already
committed to doing, such as deciding at what restaurant one will take
his wife to on Friday night. Major decisions are those that involve
adding something new to one's plate of activities. Major life
decisions require substituting something that one already has committed
to (spending time and energy on) for something else they might enjoy
better. Its these types of major decisions that this
website strives to address.
Give to Get -
Since one only has 24 hours in a day, more activities can not be added
without postponing or eliminating some of the activities one is
already doing. These major decisions all
involve giving up something one already has in exchange for gaining
something new. It's a give and take situation.
In other words, to gain something new, something the decision
maker wants and doesn't have, something they already have must be given up. Logically,
only the best new opportunities should be allowed to enter the
decision-maker's life. The least valuable activities should be
sacrificed to permit the resources in time and energy that they previously
consumed to be diverted to the new opportunities. Decision
making by this model is one of constant renewal, weeding out the
lesser valuable activities and replacing them with higher value
activities. All major decision-making has
at its core the same difficulty...giving up choices that are less than
the best to allow other better choices to enter. What makes
any decision tough is giving up what has for something one doesn't
have but wants more. Surrendering what one has is
the price that must be paid for getting what one doesn't have.
Some might consider this to be a two-step decision making
process. The first step is to select the best of the best to add
to one's life. The second step is to select the least important
thing one does to give up to permit the time and resources for the
new.
Psychological Resistance
- Adding to the
difficulty of making decisions are known psychological barriers.
For instance, picking
any one of many choices available is a decision to pursue one specific course of action instead
of others. Picking one of the choices also means an associated decision not
to pursue any of the other choices. This is particularly true when the
choices are mutually exclusion, meaning that only one choice is needed to
satisfy the identified want or need. Giving up good choices
is psychologically painful, but it is necessary to devote scarce
resources to the successful implementation of the choice
selected. Making a choice implies commitment to that choice and that one is prepared to invest the
requisite time, energy, or resources (i.e. sowing the seeds of harvest) needed
to implement the decision.
Constant Renewal
- Giving up something old for something new allows one's life to to
progress towards the better. Constant renewal weeks out the lesser
valuable and replaces it with something that is hoped will be
better. If a decision-maker were successful is the renewal
process, one's life should be getting better and better. But is
this is what happens in most people's life? In a short answer,
no it isn't. The reason one's life doesn't get
progressively better is ineffective decision making. Hence this
website to enlighten more people to use a disciplined approach to
making the major decisions in their lives.
Self-Management
- Personal decision-making is closely linked to both
self-management and time management. Each person is allotted the same
amount of time each day. How we choose to use that time defines
our differences. The rule of time management is that
time cannot be saved, it can only be spent. Deciding
how to spend one's time must fruitfully is the most important
contributor to success and happiness. In essence, decision
making is nothing more than deciding how to spend your limited time,
energy, and resources to achieve the highest satisfaction of you wants
and needs. In a
24-hour period, you can only squeeze in so many activities. The
contribution of those activities to your well-being is what
distinguishes the successful from the unsuccessful. Bad
decisions are those that don't achieve results or achieve the wrong
results. Each person must decide what activities to try
and fit into their daily allotment of 24 hours. The major
decision are those dealing with what to do and the minor decisions
deal with how to do them. Both types of decisions are important
to the results actually achieve.
Time Management
- Each person must decide how they will spend their 24-hours
per day. Activities are what fills our 24-hour time
horizon. Each person's life during a single day is
represented by a flow of activities. Each discrete
activity could be represented by a thread that winds itself in and out
of our day. When a person is multitasking, it means that
they are engaged in more than one activity simultaneously, like
walking and thinking. All activities are the result of a
decision to one thing and not another. Even not deciding
is a choice, because it means they are electing to continue what they
were last doing. Most often, our time-management choices
are made subconsciously. But the better self-managers devote
considerable time making these decisions -
consciously.
Bundles of Activities - Suppose that in a
24-hour day, each activity we engaged in was represented by a piece of
thread. Its length would be the duration of the activity, and
the color would represent the type of activity. For example,
sleep might be represented by a single, long ( eight hour) blue
thread. If one were to lay these colored threads out along a
24-hour timeline, the visual display would represent you
life. These colored threads might have repetitive
patterns, like sleep, eating, working, watching television, etc.
For each mosaic or pattern of threads, you would expect to get the
same fundamental result. For different thread patterns, you
would expect to get different results. The important point
here is you need to match the thread pattern to the result you
wanted. Going out for dinner and dancing requires a
different threat pattern than mowing the lawn. If a person
wanted to get a different result in one 24-hour period, they would
have to vary the thread pattern, otherwise, they would get the same
result they got the last time. Different thread patterns
create different results.
What and How Decisions
- Decisions don't create results by themselves, but they determine the
general direction of your march. It is the implementation
of decisions that generate the results. Thus, there are
decisions that reflect the "what" you want to accomplish and
decisions that reflect "how" you intend to manifest
them. The "what" decision is a strategic
decision that selects the desired end-state. It causes a second
set of decisions called the "how" decisions, which are the
tactical means for creating the desired end-state. It is the
combination of "what" and "how" decisions that
fill your 24-hours with activities.
Change - If you want things to be different,
then you must either do different things or do the same things
differently. As stated earlier, you need a different
thread pattern for each type of result you desire. The results
you are getting is completely determined by the threads (activities)
that you fill your life with. To get something different
requires change, either 1) ending the existing set of "whats",
2) changing "how" you are trying to achieve them, or 3)
starting new "whats". Decision making and
change are directly connected. Change requires a change in
activities and depends on decision-making to determine which of the
three change options (or combination thereof) to
use. Decisions in the activities that fill the time
ultimately produce changes in what we experience.
Trade-offs
- Decisions are tough when there is conflict
between the ends sought. Decisions are also tough when you have
more goals you want to achieve than you time, energy, and resources to
support. Most tough decisions
require trade-offs between the things the decision maker wants to gain from the
decision and the ability to give up the lesser important choices that
cannot fit into the limits of your resources. Making choices between important values is what makes tough
decisions tough. For instance, you have two choices for a new
job. One has good pay but the other has a better chance for
advancement. One has a long commute, but the other has a better work environment
and friendly coworkers. One has better health benefits, but the other has
better retirement benefits. Which alternative to you
choose? The answer is...it depends on what is more important to
you. Once you have completed the steps in the decision making process
(shown below), the decision maker should be as prepared as they will ever be to
make the decision. If in the end, both alternatives score about the same,
then you know that neither one is better than the other. You either need
to find a new, better third alternative or to flip a coin and pick either one of
the two options. Having done your homework, you will be less concerned
with the regret that often accompanies a decision. You will have examined the
alternatives available, seen clearly what each offers in terms of what is
important to you, and made a clear, examined choice. Once you decide, you
need to commit yourself to making that choice succeed my putting your best
effort forward in its implementation. The other aspect of this
website that deal with implementing decisions once they are
made. There are both risks and opportunities that come from implementing a decision,
which is what the decision maker has to do to take the choice from conception to reality.
Decision-Making Process
- The process steps
for making good decisions is outlined in the figure below. Following a
proven, disciplined procedure for making decisions does not guarantee a good
decision every time as there are too many variables that the decision maker
cannot control. However, a disciplined approach to decision-making
should improve your batting average as more of your decisions turn out better
than they would if you didn't. The hyperlinks above will take you to a
more detailed discussion of each of the seven steps of the decision making
process.
Rewards of Good Decisions
- People make
decisions and work diligently to implement them so they can reap the harvest of
their diligent labor as
their reward. If only life were so simple and that hard work always paid
off with the expected outcome we initially envisioned before we started.
But reality is a hard
teacher. We make choices, invest in them, get results, and learn from the experience.
The reason our decisions don't always turn out the way we hope or expect them to
is due to many intervening factors such as 1) the presence of uncontrollable
variables especially if there is a long delay in implementing the decision, 2) erroneous
assumptions made by the estimator, and 3) the impact of multi-decisions
interplaying with one another. As a result of these
intervening factors, the exact outcome of most decisions is uncertain.
Some decisions can be declared certain because the delay time is short, the
decision maker is working with reliable information, and there is only one
decision in play during the interval between decision and outcome.
Other decisions, especially those with high investment (time,
energy, and resources), complexity and interactions with other
decisions, and difficulty of implementations are subject
to high levels of uncertainty. Different decision making rules and
tools are need to be used for certain and uncertain decisions. This web site will deal with decisions
made under both certainty and uncertainty.
Choices - You need to invent more than one
alternative to have a choice. If you only have one
alternative, you have no choice except "go" or "no
go". As soon as you are aware of options to do
something different that what you are currently doing - the status quo - you
start the decision making process. Most of our decisions are made
unconsciously and autonomously. Only for major decisions is it
worth the time spent thinking about our choices. In fact, it is
human nature to avoid making choices. There is a
propensity to stay with the status quo just to avoid thinking about
alternatives and the hard work to implement them. To avoid the necessity of
making choices, we usually carry a high number of
default options around with us - built from experience and personal tastes - so
that we automatically know what choices we prefer as our wants and needs arise.
Payback - When faced with multiple choices,
the decision maker normally only gets to choose one of them, because most
choices are mutually exclusive. All the good alternative
cannot be pursued or consummated at the
same time. For example, if you choose to dine at restaurant A, then you are not choosing
(rejecting) all the possible restaurants you might have considered.
For each decision, there is an expected outcome (dining pleasure) and an
expected investment (the bill) that must be expended to acquire that
outcome. In one class of decision making - decision making under certainty
- the outcome associated with each
choice is fairly certain. Decisions made under certainty are decided by
comparing the rewards to the investment. Logic would suggest picking
the choice that grants the highest payback per unit of investment.
Feedback
- Decision-making is a
multi-step process. The decision-making model used in this
website is shown in the figure
below. The first five steps involves making a decision. The sixth step
is implementing the decision and collecting the outcome. There is
usually a delay time between selecting a choice and collecting the
outcome. Once the decision begins to generate results, the
decision-maker must review the outcome with respect to the original unfulfilled need and
ask the question, "Has my need been fulfilled sufficiently to move on
to the
fulfillment of other more important needs?" If the need is not
sufficiently satisfied, and the gap between the aspiration and realization is
still large relative to other needs competing for the decision-makers attention,
then the decision-making process continues for more rounds until the decision
maker concludes that the need has been sufficiently satisfied.
Uncertainty
- Uncertainty adds a further complication.
If the
outcome from a decision occurs in an uncertain future that is not under your
control, then there are usually multiple possible outcomes. Some of
the outcomes are better and some are worse than the expected. Sometimes
these multiple outcomes are determined by what are called "states of nature".
If one unpredictable and uncontrollable "state of nature"
occurs, the decision maker gets one outcome. If another
"state of nature" occurs, the decision-maker gets another
outcome. In
a condition of uncertainty, making the choice does not lead
automatically to the expected outcome. In-between the decision
and the implementation, there is time for a divergence in what was
expected and the final result. In decisions
under uncertainty, the outcome
is not under your direct control. The outcome is controlled by
"mother nature". As stated earlier, these outcomes can be predicted
and categorized as future "states of nature". Each of the scenarios or
future states has an associated outcome, some good, some bad, and some ugly. Which state of
nature will occur, after the investment has been made by the decision maker, is
the unknown part of decision making and is partially what makes decision making
so difficult. But uncertainty must be taken into account if you want to
make an informed decision. Thus, the final outcome
of a decision is usually uncertain and
dictated by mother nature (states of nature). These states
of nature can vary in terms of what the decision maker desires...some
for better or some for worse. In summary, given an uncertain future outcome, the eventual
result the decision maker receives from any decision could end up better or worst than the expected outcome.
Risk Management -
With a
little extra effort, the decision-maker may be able to increase his chances of
getting more rewards and avoiding undesirable losses. Avoiding the downside of decisions is the subject of risk management wherein the risks
inherent in a
decision are identified, assessed, and mitigated to ensure that the
objectives of the decision-maker are achieved with the resources invested.
Decision Classes - This website will eventually be expanded to cover each of the following
classes of decision shown in the figure below. Each decision class has a
slight variation in how best to reach the decision that is most appropriate for a specific
decision-maker.